The structure and style of John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men contribute to the conclusions which can be drawn from this novel, and this can be seen particularly in the novel’s introductions, where it can be seen that the conclusions drawn are inherent. Two introductions in particular express the novel’s conclusions: the introduction to the bunk house and its inhabitants, and the introduction to a death on the ranch, where conclusions about identity, loneliness, hope, and the inevitability of the failure of the American Dream during the Depression years are reflected.
One conclusion which is implicitly expressed in Of Mice and Men’s introductions is that of the significance of a job in a person’s identity. This is particularly significance in the this Depression novel as during the Depression, the average American was identified not by their name but by the service they did to the country, and that meant what job they did. This can be seen several times during our introduction to the inhabitants of the ranch. On page twenty one we see the first reference to Crooks, who remains unnamed until later on: “The stable buck’s a nigger”. This is a reference to his job, which gives him identity as the stable buck, even though unnamed at this point. This is also true of the boss, who remains nameless throughout the novel – his job is what gives him an identity “The boss stepped into the room” page twenty two. On page twenty five, Candy, unnamed at this point, is referred to as “the swamper” and this shows again that job gives one identity.
The most explicit example of a role giving one identity in the novel is Curley’s wife, who remains unnamed throughout the novel, like the boss, and it is clear that she had no identity before her marriage to Curley: she may have hoped, that by the marriage and gaining a form of identity she may achieve her dream of going to Hollywood. However, it is in Slim that we see that a job can give you not only identity, but also authority. Slim receives the longest description of any character in the novel (page thirty four/thirty five) and most of this passage describes his job. He is a “jerkline skinner” and was capable of “driving…20 mules in a single line” and “killing a fly…the mule” and these show that Slim’s authority is gained not only by the “majesty” in which he walked, but also because he was a valued worker and he had mastered his job, which was stable, unlike the other drifting ranch hands. Therefore, we can see that identity and authority in Of Mice and Men’s introductions reflects not only the conclusions of the novel but also the lifestyle of Americans during the Depression.
A conclusion about solitude can be drawn from the passages, that is, that people become “mean” or unhappy when they are alone, and this is relevant to this novel as George and Lennie are the only ones in the novel, apart from Candy and his dog, with a companion and this means that they are different from others and they have dreams and hope. This is shown in the introduction to death, that of Candy’s dog, where we see that George, Candy and Lennie, with each other, can plan setting up their own ranch (page fifty nine/page sixty one). As they have each other, we can also see that they know each other better than most people do, particularly in George and Lennie’s case. We see during the suspense filled moments before the killing the young ranch hand Whit, who talks about a man he used to work with called Bill Tenner: “Little guy…drove a cultivator” and this was the only detail about Bill they remembered, and they only knew him well enough to call him a “nice fella” and we can see this being repeated several times in the passage which introduces the ranch hands as well, with Candy referring to both the Boss and Crooks as a “nice fella”.
It is only Lennie and George who know each other well, and this allows them to pursue a dream together, and this is explained by Lennie in the first chapter, when George says that they are not like other men: “But not us! An’ why? Because…because I got you to look after me and you got me to look after you, and that’s why!” (page fifteen). This contrasts to Curley’s wife when we are introduced to her on page thirty two. She seems to be using her sexuality to attract men because she is lonely, and she thinks that companionship with another man would give her a path to her dream: “I bet she’d clear out for twenty bucks” (page thirty three), and therefore we can see that this conclusion of hope through companionship is evident in both the introduction to death and the introduction to the ranch hands.
One of the most evident conclusions which can be drawn from the introductions to Of Mice and Men is the inevitability of the failure of George and Lennie’s dream, and this represents how unlikely it seemed for the American dream to come true during the Depression. This can be seen with the introduction of Curley and his wife, where we see that it is inevitable that Lennie gets into trouble on the ranch. Curley is introduced on page twenty six, when he comes into the bunkhouse. At once George perceives trouble, and after Curley has left he tells Lennie: “…he’s gonna take a sock at you the first chance he gets” (page thirty), and he repeats his worry about Lennie getting into trouble on the ranch when he says “Look Lennie, if you get in any kind of trouble, you remember what I told you to do?” page (thirty one). His premonition of trouble is a sign that there might be trouble, and this can be seen again when Curley’s wife is introduced on page thirty two “A girl was standing there looking in.”
George thinks that she is also trouble, and again, warns Lennie to stay away from her, and describes her in words that suggest that she is going to bring trouble in the future “I seen ’em poison before…rattrap” (pages thirty four/thirty five) And the words poison and rattrap are very strong similes, suggesting that it is inevitable that she will bring trouble and as trouble on ranches is something which we have learned to associate with Lennie “…and you ain’t gonna do no bad things like you done in Weed, neither…” (page eight), the inevitability of trouble in Lennie’s case is inevitable also. Another clear indication about the inevitability of the failure of the American Dream can be seen on page thirty four when Lennie makes his view about the ranch clear “I don’t like this place George. This ain’t no good place.” If even the slow minded Lennie can foretell trouble on the ranch, then it is inevitable that there will be trouble, and therefore that the American Dream will not be realized.
John Steinbeck wrote Of Mice and Men in an era where there was no hope, no identity, and no possibility of ever achieving the American dream. The conclusions drawn from the introductions of the novel were written to encourage the American people that they could gain positive attitudes through being good at a job like Slim, who is confident about himself, or like Lennie and George, who are not “mean” because of companionship. Perhaps the reason that these ideas were in the introductions was to signify that the end of the Depression and a better life could be foreseen even at its beginning.
Post your essay. Get expert feedback. For free.We're trying to help students improve their writing the hard way. Do you know students who want critical essay reviews from a professor of English Literature? Click like to share. Click here to sign up and post your own essay. We offer no paid services. All reviews are completely free.
Of Mice And Men Novella Analysis - With A Free Essay Review
The novella, Of Mice and men by author John Steinbeck, illustrates the life of a 1930s migrant farm worker. The novella tells the story of George and Lennie, two men that have been brought together after the death of Lennies elderly Aunt Clara. Lennie and George have a dream of owning land one day, and the only way to a achieve this dream is to move from job to job raising earning enough money to purchase the land needed to fulfill their dream. In the novella, Steinbeck illustrates Lennie as mentally challenged. This disability causes many troubles for the unlikely pair on their path to the American Dream. In the novella, Steinbeck uses the characters of George and Lennie and the symbol of Candys dog to develop the theme that powerlessness can lead to a lack of choices and a feeling of entrapment.
The characters of George and Lennie help Steinbeck develop the theme because at some point in the story both are silenced, leaving them without the freedom of choice, and trapped in the hands of others. Steinbeck illustrates this with the quote said by George to Lennie, You jus stand there and dont say nothing. (Steinbeck, 6). This quote portrays the lack of power Steinbeck has give the character of Lennie. He is revealing the true lack of choices Lennie has, and the lack of decisions he makes involving their dream. While George is illustrated as leaving Lennie powerless most of the time others feel the wrath of this unfortunate problem also, including George himself. At the end of the novella George is left with the unfortunate choice to shoot Lennie after an ill-fated problem arises from Lennies unlucky strength. George came to the realization that the other men would not act rationally in dealing with this issue, but will do their utmost to make Lennies death painful. George is left powerless in this situation, he has no choice but to take Lennie out himself, for he will do it much more humanely. Overall, Lennie was left powerless through most of the novella, and was not allowed to make many choices for himself. George also experiences this powerlessness in a higher degree, but not as prolonged as Lennie.
The symbol of Candys dog helped Steinbeck develop the theme because the death of his dog reflected the love he felt for him, and the lack of power and choice Candy had when it came to the dogs death. Candys dog had grown to a very old age, and had begun to annoy the other occupants of the bunk house. Carlson, one of the most annoyed men, suggests to Candy that he should shoot the dog, that he would even do it for him. Steinbeck portrayed Candy and his dogs relationship as loving, so naturally Candy does not want his dog to be killed. This is shown in the quote, Maybe itd hurt him I dont mind takin care of him. (Steinbeck, 45.) But after Carlson berates Candy for some time over the matter and no disapproval is seen from the silent Slim, Candy reluctantly agreed, Awright---take im. (Steinbeck, 47). This situation, and quote, thoroughly illustrated the lack of power and choice Candy had with the other men. Even when it came to the one thing he truly loved, he could not find the power to save his elderly companion.
In conclusion, the theme of powerlessness can lead to a lack of choices and a feeling of entrapment, was shown through the struggles that the characters Lennie and George were put through, and the symbol of Candys dog. Steinbeck uses all of these examples to truly show the lack of power some had in these migrant farm settings. This theme was so important when it came to understanding this novella, because it showed that no matter what size a man is, or how well he thinks, he can become powerless in the direst of situations.
Your writing tends to be wordy and vague. Here's an example of wordiness: "In the novella, Steinbeck illustrates Lennie as mentally challenged." Here's the shorter and better version: "Lennie is mentally challenged." Since you're talking about Steinbeck's book, it's understood that he's responsible for the characteristics of the characters. Don't waste your reader's time. Here's an example of vagueness: "George is left with the unfortunate choice to shoot Lennie after an ill-fated problem arises from Lennies unlucky strength." There's no need to be so vague. Just say what happened: Lennie unintentionally killed a woman, and so on.
In part because of the vagueness of the writing and in part because you have not fully worked out the logic of your argument, the argument of your essay tends to be a bit vague too. You claim that Lennie has no choices but justify it only by reference to a quotation about his just standing around. You say George has no choice but justify by reference to his choosing to kill Lennie. You say Candy lacks power and choice because he allowed someone to kill his aging dog. That's not enough to establish that powerlessness is a theme of the story and it's not enough to establish that powerlessness leads to not having choices. Finally, your last sentence introduces a new claim about the importance of the theme of powerlessness that is interesting (i.e., the claim about it not mattering about a man's size or his brain) but also unsupported.
Submitted by: Mlana